Dangers due to failing Governance!

Do we have a right to complain about

Failing Governance?

In the recent past, there have been an ever-increasing list of articles in newspapers and incidents covered by TV Channels pertaining to:

• Violence against women
• Farmer Suicides
• Naxal menace
• Virtually endless scams, scandals involving both governments and corporates
• Paralysis in Policy-making
• Problems with virtually EACH of our neighbouring nations
• Lack of cooperation between states, between states and the Centre on various issues

The common thread in all the above is the declining standards of Governance.

Simultatneously, there continuse to exist a different world populated by upper middle class sophisticated urbanites and by High-networth-individuals. This group of the "Haves" continues to indulge in a quality life style, enjoying all kinds of goodies. While a small number of these may perhaps be actively corrupt individuals, the vast majority of this group is represented by:

• Hard working individuals cutting across all age groups and includes women and men in equal measure
• Professionals
• Successful entrepreneurs
• Educated individuals
• Financially successful organised sector employees

What is disappointing (in fact depressing), however, is that most of the above "Haves" actually don't give a damn about Governance related issues. They have a sharp focus on their own micro-lives. They get educated well, earn well, spend well, and live in a cucoon. Their homes are part of multi-block apartments deep inside reasonably well-protected colonies which often prove to be quasi-independent ecosystems with their own physical and social infrastructure. Like the kid Gautama Buddha, many of these folks don't even begin to see true poverty, the plight of the "Have-nots", the suffering of the vast majority.

Many of them (especially those under the age of, say, 20-25 years) have perhaps never:

• Stood in a queue in a ration shops to buy their groceries (it would indeed be surprising if they are consciously aware that ration shops still exist in cities)
• Understood the impact of not having more than 3-4 sets of clothing for young children of their drivers, servant maids, scavengers, peons, etc.
• Comprehended the plight of having to choose between medical care for an ailing dependent parent, education of a child and saving for retirement (Often, saving for retirement takes a beating, resulting in the creation of an entire generation of dependent ailing and/or aged parents in the future as well).
• Imagined that money spent by their family on a pleasant evening of a movie at a mall followed by a dinner would be sufficient to take care of the entire monthly expenditure of a whole family of 5-6 persons from an impoverished background.

Sadly, I can't even blame these youngsters from the family of "Haves". The blame squarely falls on their parents, teachers and the society at large.

To top it off, the "Haves" don't hesitate to use all their resources (legal and otherwise, ethical and unfair) at their disposal to further strengthen the prevailing disparity of income and wealth. To take a simple, mundane, day-to-day example, most of the "Haves" among the salaried classes get regular increments and promotions year after year. But when it comes to increasing the salary of their watchmen, servant maids, etc., they rarely do it automatically. Certainly not on an annual basis. Most certainly not sufficiently to cover inflation. In fact, any such revision happens only under dire threats of resignation (if the "Haves" have not planned for an alternative already).

Any person who has ever bought an apartment or got a driving licence or studied from an engineering or medical college or studied at a high-quality neighbourhood convent in any city would have directly or indirectly participated in the process of bribery and corruption. Having derived the benefits of such bribery, the very same "Haves" tend to sermonise and criticise their political masters for their corrupt practices. Taking it to ridiculous heights, many of the "Haves" refuse to participate in the political process as either candidates or campaigners or even voters, calling it "the ultimate gutter". And expect that positive changes will occur entirely on their own, almost as if by magic.

The "Haves" can't have the cake, eat it, preserve it for posterity and start a bakery. If they want to make India truly free of corruption, they need to jump into the fray and participate actively.

And this participation needs to be in numbers comparable to the crowds that one sees in an IPL match or a Rajnikant movie.

Then, and only then, will any meaningful change happen in our society.

Regards,

N

Demotion and ignominy first, Appointment as IRDA Chief next!

Demotion and ignominy first,

Appointment as IRDA Chief next!

This, then, is the perplexing story of TS Vijayan, ex-Chairman of Life Insurance Corporation of India, who has now been appointed as the chief of Insurance Regulatory & Development Authority, the regulator of the Insurance sector - Read this news item in Economic Times first, before moving on to my thoughts on the news:

• TS Vijayan, ex-LIC Boss appointed as IRDA Chief

 

I do not wish to go into the merits of whether or not TS Vijayan ought to have been demoted from the position of Chairman, LIC. Nor do I intend saying anything about his credentials to occupy the position of IRDA Chief.

However, I wish to emphasise that one of the above two decisions by the powers that be is blatantly wrong.

After all, when a person is demoted from the position of Chairman, LIC to the position of Managing Director, LIC, it is not a routine decision taken without due thought and due process. Obviously, the government of the day, after going through all the relevant acts of omission and commission, all the available data points, all the necessary questioning of concerned stakeholders, came to the conclusion that TS Vijayan ought to be demoted.

Let's call this Decision 1.

A few months go by. The then Finance Minister goes on to become the President of India. A different person moves into the role of Finance Minister. And guess what happens? Another round of consultations. Another due process. Presumably another evaluation of multiple canidates for a key vacancy of IRDA Chief. And, finally, TS Vijayan is appointed as the big boss of IRDA.

Let's call this Decision 2.

To my limited understanding, if Decision 1 is a correct decision, Decision 2 is not merely an inappropriate decision, but an act of negligence which is sure to have an adverse impact on the confidence of stake holders in the Insurance Regulator. And vice versa.

Is this a desirable situation?

Regards,

N

Hindi Imposition through the Back-Door???

Hindi Imposition through the Back-Door???

I just came across an advertisement in the Hindu and Times of India - This was released by the Rajya Sabha Secretariat. This advertisement is pertaining to the Readjustment of Representations of SC & ST in Parliamentary and Assembly Constituencies Bill, 2013:

• Rajya Sabha advertisement inviting suggestions

Interestingly, the advertisement invites suggestions to be sent in this connection but, surprisingly, insists that suggestions can be sent ONLY in either English or Hindi.

Coming as it does in the aftermath of the recent attempt to change the rules of UPSC Exams (for entry into IAS, IPS, etc.), this is truly shocking and a clear case of imposition of Hindi through the backdoor.

After all, how many people from interior rural areas of Tamil Nadu, Kerala, West Bengal, etc. would know enough of English or Hindi? There must be a provision to send such suggestions in all the major official languages of India such as Tamil, Marathi, Gujarati, Bengali, Telugu, etc.

Let me make one thing abundantly clear: I am not trying to be a regional language chauvinist.

My only query: What happens to equity? If this goes on in a similar vein, I'm sure there will be a series of anti-Hindi agitations. India has enough problems of its own. Let the government not try and create more problems!

Regards,

N

Cheating due to "Under-weight LPG Cylinders"

Cheating due to "Under-weight LPG Cylinders"

In the past when there was a huge subsidy being given on ALL LPG cylinders, middle-class citizens were in a position to possibly turn a blind eye and ignore the problem of under-weight LPG cylinders.

However, "unlimited subsidy" is history now. Beyond 9 cylinders per annum, we are forced to pay market rates for our LPG cylinders. Considering this fact, lesser mortals like you and me can't afford to ignore the problem of under-weight LPG cylinders.

Hence, the following article from moneylife.com makes interesting reading - Read on:

• Cheating due to "Under-weight LPG Cylinders"

Regards,

N

Compensation for Rape Victims ... ... ...

Compensation for Rape Victims ... ... ...

From time to time, I've heard reports of compensation announced for the family of the Delhi gang-rape victim. A couple of examples are given below:

• Delhi Government announces 15 lakhs compensation, UP Government to give 20 lakhs to Delhi rape victim's family
  
  
• Government plans to allot DDA Flat for Delhi rape victim's family, college seat for victim's kin

Perhaps this is over and above any cost incurred towards her treatment at Delhi and at Singapore.

I have nothing to comment about what should be the right levels of compensation that would be appropriate for the family of the Delhi gang rape victim. Obviously, that is bound to be a subjective decision at the moment.

However, I certainly feel quite strongly about the need for identifying a basis for determining such compensation for victims of crimes against women succumb and die or survive and suffer.

Those who are from Chennai would have heard about the recent acid attack victims Vinodhini and Vidya who did not survive despite the best efforts of the doctors.

As progressive thinking individuals repeatedly point out, the figure of over 24000 cases of REPORTED rape every year across India is obviously unacceptable. However, the absence of a public furore over a specific instance or a major protest over another incident should not be the basis on which compensation figures are determined.

Will someone tell our law-makers and the media to look into this aspect of crimes against women?

As an aside, when a specific crime against a particular woman is proven to be blatantly false and it is found that it was based on a false complaint, is there any known case where the poor man (who was proven to be innocent after a long legal battle) has got any meaningful compensation either from the courts or the government?

Regards,

N

Why we are responsible for blasts in our cities ... ... ...

Why we are responsible for blasts in our cities ...

For far too long we've been blaming everyone else for much of the mess in the country. Especially for terror strikes. Including the latest Hyderabad blasts on February 21, 2013.

It is obviously easy to blame:

• The "self-centred, short-termist" politicians - across all parties
  
  
• The "lazy" bureaucrats
  
  
• The "inefficient" police
  
  

I personally feel that each Indian citizen ought to shoulder at least part of the responsibility. I had written a post on this subject in 2011 with reference to the Mumbai blasts. In case you missed it, you can read it here:

• Why we are (and I am) responsible for the Mumbai Blasts?

Apparently, nobody did anything and nothing happened.

And the Hyderabad blasts have taken place earlier this evening (on February 21, 2013) at Hyderabad.

I was watching the various news channels.

One obvious thing that was highly visible was:

• Two LPG Cylinders, apparently meant for domestic use, which appear to have been located at the eatery at or near which the blasts happened.

Here are a few questions for you and me, the ordinary citizens of the country:

• Why were we using domestic cylinders for commercial purposes? (I'm sure that the managers and/or owners who run the eatery are people like you and me and I'm including them among the broad subset of "you and me")
  
  
• When we were eating at the eatery or working in the eatery as waiters or cashiers, we noticed these domestic cylinders - and stayed silent. Why?
  
  
• When we were checking the LPG connection, we would have found that it is being used for commercial use - Why did we keep quiet?
  
  
• When we delivered the cylinders every other week, we would have visibly seen that domestic cylinders were being used for commercial purposes. And we didn't bother. Why?
  
  

The single simple answer: Corruption.

It may be a case of monetary corruption by way of bribe-giving or bribe-taking. Or it may be the corruption of silently tolerating corruption.

Once you and I tolerate corruption in this manner, once you and I behave in such a corrupt manner, we

• Lose the right to crib about corruption - and more importantly,
  
  
• Lose the courage to go and approach a law-enforcement agency (like the police, for instance) to complain about any form of corruption

Therefore, you and I

• Will not go and tell the traffic constable about the suspicious man hanging around with an odd parcel in his hand.
  
  
• Will not volunteer to be a witness and volunteer information even after the blast
  
  

And if you and I still think that terror strikes will stop, you and I are living in a fool's paradise.

The time has come for you and I to own our share of responsibility. 

Once we become reasonably "proper, responsible citizens", then, and only then can we expect "them" to ensure that such terror strikes don't impact us!

Regards,

N

Independence Movement of Texas

Independence Movement of Texas

I've been reading with interest a whole lot of articles about the "not-so-recent" Independence Movement of Texas. Apparently, there is a growing wish on the part of Texans to secede from the United States of America.

Take a look at a couple of articles in this connection:

• "Texas Secession Movement Picks up Momentum" - Huffingtonpost.com
  
  
• "We want to be Alone, says Texas Nationlist Movement" - Independent.co.uk

For a variety of reasons, it may not necessarily be a bad idea to have smaller states in India - Stuff like administrative convenience, focus on local issues, decentralisation of power, genuine federalism, etc.

The very same reasons would, perhaps, make it worth asking: Should the world seriously considering the option of having a larger number of smaller nations by "dividing" the present-day large nations into smaller nations?

Will it not result in a more peaceful world? After all, such a situation will imply that no single nation will be as much of a super-power as, say, a present day United States or China, for instance.

Will it not result in a much greater focus on local and regional priorities?

A lot of experts keep telling us that "huge banks" can be a rather unacceptable systemic risk for the world of finance. They want the banks to "be cut down to size".

We have very strong "pro-competition regulators" to prevent the formation of monopolies.

These are just two quick examples from the field of commerce.

If such a relatively minor ecosystem such as the corporate world makes us look at "limiting the size of players", is it not logical that we should also be favourably inclined to look at the option of smaller nations?

Most importantly, considering the manner in which many "powerful nations" in general and the US in particular have been "interfering" in the internal affairs of a rather large number of developing countries, I feel that the time has come for the developing world to be on the look out for opportunities to strategically reciprocate.

Let's take the example of Texas. 

I feel that countries like India, South Africa, Brazil, members of the Gulf Cooperation Council, etc. should start making noises along the following lines:

• "The independence movement of Texas is an internal matter of the State of Texas and the United States of America and we will not take any steps to aggrevate the situation unnecessarily".
  
  
• "Independent think tanks will certainly be given liberty to hold seminars and discussions to discuss about the genuine aspirations of the people of Texas. That does not imply that the opinions expressed by the participants in such seminars represent the views of our Government"
  
  
• "People like Daniel Miller, the leader of the Texas Nationalist Movement (TNM), Larry Secede Kilgore, telecommunications consultant & pro-secession advocate, Peter Morrison, treasurer of the Hardin County Republican party, Alan Daves (who calls himself "The Texas Mob-Father"), etc. are thought leaders with a view different from the present official thought process. Without compromising our relationship with the USA, we will continue to engage with these important thought leaders by inviting them to address seminars and conferences in our cities, discuss their thoughts and ideas for the future of the global political equations, etc."
  
  

After all, if countries like the USA, UK, Canada etc. can "keep playing politics" by "silently supporting" secession movements in developing nations and by provoking various developing nations against each other to further their own "national interests", so can we!

Let's make a beginning by inviting Daniel Miller to New Delhi to address a few conferences at, say, the India Habitat Centre! Perhaps we can also invite people like the Dalai Lama, Robert Burns, the Scottish independence advocate, etc. for such conferences!

Regards,

N

---